Up on those shoulders. Over that soft tummy, the gray-haired chest slopping in.
Sitting up there, hands clutched together in clumps of see-through white.
He walks you around the edge of the lake. It feel so light up there on those shoulders,
Falling would just mean floating, then landing, then hopping back up.
And a rare smile from grandpa at the sight of the bouncing boy.
But you can’t see that smile parked up on there on his shoulders.
You can’t see his face, in fact.
You’re looking forward, you’re breathing in his cherry tobacco hum.
You’re grandpa’s face today. He’s got a happy five-year-old’s face.
You’re giving that to him.
He’s giving you lift.
Author: admin
-
Lift
-
Calling CV
Regular readers of this Extreme Punditry series have probably figured out by now that I’m about as good an election-predictor as my cat Sammy is an umbrella. Which is to say, not very.
Even so, even with my poor track record at this whole election-predicting thing, I’m ready to wander out on that limb one more time and herewith predict that Cecil Vortex will go 100% for…Barack Obama! (Just my luck, Mitt will now come through with an upset.)
In terms of the other gazillion folks voting today, it feels like McCain will have a great day, with the possible exception of a California upset for Romney. Clinton will win several more states than Obama, but only a few more delegates. I’m going to say, um, a 53%/47% delegate swing in Clinton’s favor. Slight edge for Clinton in the press spin. And the race goes on.
Any other predictions out there?
-Cecil -
An Interview with Keri Smith
Photo credit: Jefferson Pitcher.
Keri Smith is an author/illustrator turned guerilla artist. She is the author and illustrator of several activity books aimed at jump-starting creativity, including Wreck This Journal (2007, Penguin Books), The Guerilla Art Kit (2007, Princeton Architectural Press), Living Out Loud (2003, Chronicle Books), and Tear Up This Book!: The Sticker, Stencil, Stationery, Games, Crafts, Doodle, And Journal Book For Girls! (2005, American Girl).
As a freelance illustrator she’s worked for a variety of clients, including Random House, the Washington Post, the New York Times, Ford Motor Co., the Boston Globe, and Hallmark. In the last few years she’s lectured and run workshops on the topic of living creatively for the HOW Design Conference, U.C. Davis, and schools across North America.
Keri Smith on the Web: Keri Smith.com, The Wish Jar
Cecil Vortex: What got you started making creativity books?
Keri Smith: I’ve been trying to figure this out for myself. For some reason I cannot stop making activity books based on the subject of creativity. I seem to be obsessed with it, even though I will admit that I get tired of talking about it directly and would rather just have people do something (as opposed to talking about doing something) — a conundrum for an author, yes?
I can tell you a few things that I know about it in list form (just because I like lists):- My medium is most definitely books. I have been obsessed with books my whole life and worked in bookstores for years. As a child I had a favorite activity book (called Good Times) that I think had a lot to do with forming my creative brain.
- I love the idea of creating books that give people more of a direct experience with life instead of walking through it passively. Get up out of your chair and take a look at things around you for crying out loud! Turn off the TV and use your brain cells before they deteriorate completely! There is no time to waste. Aren’t we all just aching for a bit of adventure? It’s all there in various forms. It’s just about a conscious decision to “tune in.” My books are just a little reminder of why and how to do this (for myself too).
- I am drawn to experimenting (in various forms). My favorite artists and authors are often those who are “playing,” trying things, not necessarily succeeding at them, but seeing where an idea takes you. This concept of play comes up constantly for me and is in large part the foundation for all of my work. To truly conduct an experiment, you must not know where you are headed. It can be scary at times, but that fear is what excites me about it. What happens when I try “this”? A direct confrontation with the UNKNOWN. It is such a great metaphor for life because none of us truly know where we are headed. We can try to control it but at a deep level we aren’t ever really in control.
- My family life growing up was not about taking risks (make sure you have all your bases covered, don’t attempt things unless you know what the outcome will be, take the safe route). I think in part my life/creative work is a form of rebellion against this and about choosing to do the opposite in a given situation to see what happens. I had to learn to trust in my ability to deal with whatever comes up in the moment. And guess what? You really can deal with “whatever comes up.” You are much stronger and more creative than you think. But you have to jump off a cliff all the time to figure that out. Every time I do, I learn how amazing a feeling it is. There is nothing that can hurt you in this. Fear of taking risks is a fear of living.
- For a while now I have enjoyed working with the concepts of imperfection and impermanence (the Japanese refer to it as wabi-sabi). I think this concept is quite rare in Western culture, which seems obsessed with making things as perfect as possible — technology, bodies (plastic surgery), mechanization of life, etc.
So I see the books as another way to present the idea of embracing imperfections and actually incorporating them into your process (Wreck This Journal is a good example of this). I guess what I am saying here is that books are a way to share my philosophies and get some different ideas out into the culture at large. At some level I enjoy the thought of taking ideas from some slightly edgier artists and thinkers and incorporating them into my work so that a new audience can experience them.
CV: Can you talk a little bit more about play and how that shows up in your creative process? -
Calling FL
Yes, and here we are, Fl primary day, and I’m sticking with Mitt in first, Johnny Mac a close second, despite the guv’s endorsement, and Rudy outta the race by tomorrow.
Any other other calls out there? -
Clinton’s southern strategy
If you’ve been following this race obsessively, you prolly already know that Michigan was stipped of its delegates to the Dem convention for moving their election date up against party rules. Hillary ended up being the only candidate on the ballot. And yes she won. I get a big kick out of the way her advisers routinely roll that victory into her legit string victories. Are they fooling folks with this? I guess. Still, even they must know how lame it all is.
All of which brings us to Florida, which is in the same boat as Michigan — no Dem delegates. Despite that, the Clinton campaign has been pitching woo there, most recently by arguing over the last few days that their delegates should be reinstated. And yes, she’s going to win big in Florida this Tuesday. And it’ll mean nothing delegate-wise, but their hope is that the media will still turn it into a “Hillary’s back” story.
The very latest twist in all this is that, despite the fact that the candidates are not supposed to be campaigning in these states, she’ll actually be in Florida election eve. One assumes that’s so she can give a victory speech in this delegate-free primary. All of which leads us to this lovely quote from Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton:“If the Clinton campaign’s southern strength rests on the outcome in a state where they’re the only ones competing, that should give Democrats deep pause.”
-
Clinton fatique
This interesting column from the LA Times sums up my feelings this week about the Clintons. The trigger for me was watching the most recent debate. In particular, it was watching Hillary in the first half of the debate say things about Obama she knew were broad, already-refuted mischaracterizations, often with a grin.
We may have to settle for that approach to politics. But I’d rather not. -
Calling SC/FL
It’s a dash of a day, but there’s always time to go on record. I’m saying Obama, Clinton, then Edwards in SC (shooting down Edwards chance at an upset 2nd place finish) with Obama winning by 8 points or better and cleaning up in SC delegates.
Meanwhile, in FL I’m once again going with Mitt who, frankly, has treated me shabbily so far in these predictions and owes me one. Johnny Mac a close second. Rudy outta the race before the 5th.
Any other other calls out there?
Update: In a new low, it appears I didn’t even predict the day of the GOP FL primary correctly. It’s not today, it’s next Tuesday. Boy, wotta mess. Unless… Unless… Unless I did that on purpose to your lower expectations of my oracular accuracy (aka my “oracuracy”)? Oooooh, I am clever. -
Wednesday’s million-dollar idea: pay-to-play email indulgences
You pay me a buck a year. Just a buck a year! I send you an email every Tuesday that says: “Forgiven.”
(I’m telling you, I just got an email that said “forgiven” and it felt fantastic.) -
Calling SC/LV
Three tough races to call today — South Carolina and Nevada for the GOP and Nevada for the Dems. I’m gonna go Huckabee in SC (Evangelicals slog through the rain and snow), with McCain a close second. Thompson comes in third and is finally allowed to quit the race. Romney takes Nevada for the GOP with Fred Paul in second. Nobody particularly cares except Romney, who bursts into song on national TV (“you say Nevada, I say Nevahdah”) to mixed reviews.
Clinton leads in the polls in Nevada, Obama has a little more union juice. I’m going with my heart and picking Obama, because yes, yes it’s true. I want it to be so.
Update: Once again I look to John Edwards for inspiration. This is a marathon, I say, a marathon, not a sprint, sez Edwards. Yes. That’s what this is. This is a marathon that I am losing badly.
So I blew SC, flubbed Nevada Dems, and only got Nevada GOP right, which was a gimme. Still, America insists that I continue to make these shoddy calls and I will not let America down. -
Calling Michigan
The Republicans have their big Michigan primary today. Some say Romney needs to win here to stay viable. And yes, I’m going to keep betting on Romney. Just try and stop from betting on Romney. You can’t do it. My Romney-betting impulse is simply too strong. And you are too weak.
If he actually wins, the thing I’m wrestling with is what does he say? He can’t flat out say “I’m the comeback kid” because he’s been claiming to be in the lead with his “two silvers and a gold” line (second place in Iowa and NH, first place in Wyoming).
On the other hand, he’s going to really want to say, “I’m the comeback kid!” because politicians love to say that phrase. It makes them feel like they’re gruff, likable, wild west outlaws. Like, you know, “Butch Cassidy and the Comeback Kid.”
The best I can figure is that either he’ll say, “change change, kid this is comeback personal.” Or possibly, “come change back kid personal personal Romney!” Or maybe even, “Romney Romney Romney my dad I am Barack Obama.” Whichever he runs with you, you’re going to be emotionally impacted. Brace for it.
Also, I’m going with two “dear friends” and three “my friends” for McCain in his quasi-concession speech.
Any other calls?
Update: It’s true what they say — a stopped watch is right twice a day!